CATTI考试二级笔译考后经验分享?这些备考经验你值得拥有，下面小编就和大家分享CATTI考试二级笔译考后经验分享，希望能够帮助到大家，来欣赏一下吧。
CATTI考试二级笔译考后经验分享
一、三级笔译 VS. 中级口译
笔者：大佬，话说，你考CATTI之前有考过中高口之类的吗?
Chennan：考过，上海中口，笔试过了，口试挂了
笔者：那么，二级是不是比中口要难，而且更加专业?
Chennan：这个...不好比...综合能力我觉得都差不多，但是据说CATTI通过率更低一些，好像翻译专业的研究生必须要通过这个才能毕业，所以也可以CATTI含金量更高?我个人的看法，哈哈。
笔者：综合能力其实是不是就看自己的英语水平扎不扎实?
Chennan：恩，大概吧，题量还是蛮大的。
笔者： 嗯哪嗯哪，是这样滴~有打算继续考二级口译不?
Chennan：有吧，明年五月二口，如果时间合适的话。
二、考试必备工具——英汉大词典!
(Chennan同学在论坛帖中提及，考试的时候带了一本陆谷孙先生主编的《英汉大词典》，英译中的时候帮了大忙。笔译的考试是允许带词典的哦，但是电子词典恐怕就不行了。陆谷孙先生这本《英汉大词典》非常权威，是做翻译的必备工具书，但是又厚又重，笔者曾经在书店看到，于是迅速打消了要买一本的念头……)
笔者：那本传中的英汉大词典~是不是因为词条解释很详细，所以帮助很大?
Chennan：这是之一，还有就是词条收录比较全，各种诡异的国家地名都有。比方我第一次考的时候，朗伊尔城，这个我小辞典就没查到，但是是个记分点。
笔者：居然考这么诡异的地名……果然够专业~~那一本厚厚的字典，随身带累不累啊?
Chennan：我第一次考试就是因为这个，结果没买....58分.....所以第二次狠心扛了这本大的，嘿嘿....
笔者：真的要用扛的啊~~
Chennan：过了不是更爽....双肩包背背也无所谓啦...我前面那个女孩子，还拉了个旅行箱呢...结果也是拖了这本大辞典，我俩当时就相视一笑...
笔者：那么汉译英的话，有没有人会同时带一本汉英大辞典~
Chennan：也有，看你自己。
三、实务备考经验
笔者：汉译英会有很专业的名词出现么?还是更注重翻译的技巧之类?
Chennan：会有的，比方这次出现了一些什么什么协议，翻译技巧....这个看你怎么看，我觉得流畅流利最重要，我平时狠看了一阵子北京周刊，还是很有帮助的。我感觉，他会有一篇比较政治性的文章，什么方针政策之类的，有一篇就比较普通平常，不过这个不是我的强项，当时感觉简直乱翻一气...
笔者：如果要背两本大字典去考试……恐怖~~是不是英译汉保证不多失分，那么整体得分也会比较高?或者汉译英、英译汉中保证一个考好了，整体分数也会拉上去?
Chennan：额，英译汉占50分哦，自然更重要些...我自己的感觉哦，这次我英译汉明显做的比上次好，汉译英就跟上次差不多...我自己觉得英译汉更重要，不过当然两个都好最好了
笔者：嗯~了解~~也就是还是可以有所侧重的~那么，准备考试的时候翻译有花多少时间去联系捏?或者看平时的积累，还是拿真题练手?
Chennan：我觉得哦，因为我平时对自己的英语还是比较有自信的，所以就花了大概一个月的时间，把教材看了一遍，就是自己翻一遍再对照他给的译文，看差在哪里，然后就是做了那两本题，一本真题，一本全真模拟，然后整理一下错的，差不多这样就够了，平时就多看看英文杂志什么的。
笔者： 很有针对性的方法哈~那么，如果准备口试的话，有啥计划没有泥?
Chennan：估计还是会先狠练一阵子基本功，然后再看看教材，做做真题吧，这个我比较弱，要多下些功夫...不过还早，要明年五月份呢
笔者：加油加油，时间这么充裕，努力去考出来吧~
笔者总结：Chennan的学习方法很好哦，大家发现没?首先，不论考试对英语水平有什么要求，不去管它，好好磨练自己的英语整体水平才是正事。可能你听到的说法是CATTI二级比高口还难，但是考试难不难，老实说不关我们的事啊，它是一个不会动的对手，而我们大可以通过努力提高自己的水平，英语考试也不过就那点题型，怕啥?(笔者从Chennan同学的经验中增长了信心!!)
其次，Chennan同学提到经常看英语杂志，不管是积累词汇量还是提升阅读速度，看英语新闻报导都是很方便快捷的方法，如果没时间啃大部头的原版小说，上网看英语新闻、买份英文报纸看看，也是不错的训练方法——不知道上哪看?
其次就是真题——一套真题搭配一套模拟题，Chennan同学就是靠这两样装备拿下二级的啊，不过不是做做就完事，Chennan同学说了，要记得巩固整理
CATTI考试近年来有越来越热的趋势，正如Chennan同学所言，CATTI确实是更加专业、含金量更高的证书，想专业从事翻译的同学肯定要过这一关的，即便不考证，也可以以考促学呀，可以通过这个考试来验证和提高一下自己的翻译水平。毕竟备考的过程也是大有裨益的，还是那句老话，证书不重要，重要的是学到了什么——以翻译能力为目标的小伙伴们，一起加油!!
口译笔译考试中级笔译全真模拟试题
Part A Compulsory Translation (必译题)(30 points)
The Dreadlock Deadlock
In the fall of 1993 Christopher Polk transferred from FedEx‘s hub in Indianapolis to take over a delivery route in Flatbush District, Brooklyn, N.Y. But moving to the country’s largest community of Caribbean and African immigrants only precipitated a far more profound journey. "I was becoming culturally aware of the history of the black people," says Polk, now 31, "and that gave me these spiritual questions." His answer came providentially, by way of a music video featuring Lord Jamal, who raps about the Rastafarian belief in the sanctity of dreadlocks - the cords of permanently interlocked strands first worn by African chiefs perhaps 6,000 years ago.
Now a practicing Rastafarian, Polk sports thick garlands that gently cascade onto his shoulders. "Your hair is your covenant," he says. "Once you grow your locks, it puts you on a path."
Unfortunately, that path was a collision course with Federal Express‘s grooming policy, which requires men to confine their dos to "a reasonable style." After years of deliberation, Polk’s bosses gave him a choice: shear his locks or be transferred to a lower-paid job with no customer contact. He refused both options and was terminated in June 2000.
His tale is not unique. Although Rastafarians number about 5,000 nationally, today dreadlocks, twists or braids are at the height of fashion, nearly as common as Afros were 30 years ago. If Afros symbolized militancy, dreads signal a more spiritual self-declaration, a figurative locking with African ancestors. As Stanford professor Kennell Jackson, who teaches a course called "African Coiffures and Their New World Legacies," puts it, "There‘s a divinity to these locks."
Divine or not, some employers consider them unacceptably outré. Six other New York-area FedEx employees have lost their jobs because of dreadlocks. They have sued, alleging religious discrimination; the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and New York‘s attorney general have also charged FedEx with violating religious protections in the Civil Rights Act.
The dreadlock deadlock may be easing. FedEx altered its policy slightly a few weeks ago: in the future, observant employees who seek a waiver may wear their locks tucked under uniform hats, says a company spokeswoman. The concession isn‘t enough to settle the lawsuits yet. The EEOC also wants reinstatement for the fired drivers, says trial attorney Michael Ranis. He’s optimistic. Some new styles, he knows, grow more appealing over time.
CATTI二级笔译实务英译汉真题
We mark the passing of 800 years, and that is indeed a remarkable span for any institution. But history is never an even-flowing stream, and the most remarkable thing about modern Cambridge has been its enormous growth over the past half century. Since I came up as an undergraduate in 1961 the student population has more than doubled. More students have meant more teachers, and, even more significantly, more scholars devoted solely to research: every category has more than doubled in numbers. This huge increase has been partly absorbed by an expansion of the colleges: they all have more students and more Fellows than they did 50 years ago; and, since 1954, no fewer than 11 of the 31 colleges are either brand new foundations, or have been conjured up as new creations from existing but quite different bodies. From being a university primarily driven by undergraduate education, Cambridge's reputation is now overwhelmingly tied to its research achievements, which can be simply represented by the fact that more than three-quarters of its current annual income is devoted to research. This has brought not just new laboratories but new buildings to house whole faculties and departments: in the mid-20th century few faculties had a physical manifestation beyond, perhaps, a library and a couple of administrative offices.
Cambridge attracts the best students and academics because they find the University and the colleges stimulating and enjoyable places in which to live and work. The students are thrown in with similarly able minds, learning as much from each other as from their teachers; the good senior academics know better than to be too hierarchical or to cut themselves off from intellectual criticism and debate.
One generation dismisses another: not even Erasmus or Newton, Darwin or Keynes stand unscathed by the passage of time; nor can we be but humbled, especially in our day when so much information is so easily accessible, by the vast store of knowledge which we can approach but never really control. Our library and museum collections bring us into contact with many lives lived in the past. They serve as symbols of the continuity of learning, or the diversity of views,of an obligation to wrestle with fact and argument, to come to our own conclusions, and in turn to be accountable for our findings. The real quest is not for knowledge, but for understanding.
